Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425403›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025

Novel Aortic Root Measurement Technique Using the Laplace Diameter for Identifying Patients at Risk for Type A Dissection.

Asanish Kalyanasundaram, Lisa C Harling, Mohammad A Zafar, Hesham Ellauzi, Bulat A Ziganshin, John A Elefteriades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asanish KalyanasundaramAortic Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lisa C HarlingAortic Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Mohammad A ZafarAortic Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Hesham EllauziAortic Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Bulat A ZiganshinAortic Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
John A ElefteriadesAortic Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Laplace law is commonly applied to calculate aortic wall stress by using the luminal pressure and the aortic diameter. Wall stress bears on the likelihood of aortic dissection in dilated aortas. However, the Laplace law applies only to circles and cylinders. It is not applicable for the aortic root, which can be more closely described as a cloverleaf shape, rather than a circle. We have recently developed a mathematically based measuring technique specifically for the aortic root. This Methods: In this study, we assessed the predictive ability of the Laplace diameter vs the standard sinus-to-commissure measurement in 33 patients who underwent predissection computed tomographic scans for unrelated reasons in close temporal proximity to their acute aortic event. We analyzed 14 chest computed tomographic scans of 33 patients who received predissection scans for unrelated reasons. Results: We observed a 16.1% increase in the mean root diameter using the Laplace diameter. We found that 21.4% of the analyzed predissection scans could have resulted in detection and prevention of the aortic dissection through surgery if the Laplace diameter had been applied. Conclusions: We validated the novel method of the Laplace diameter clinically in determining the aortic root diameter and detecting the risk of aortic dissection.

Identifiers

PMID41425403
PMCPMC12712140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.