Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425358›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy techniques2025

Arthroscopic Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation With Interpositional Demineralized Bone Fiber Implant.

Tyler M Goodwin, Aaron Davidson, Frantz R Lerebours, Bashir A Zikria, Anthony Miniaci, Derek F Papp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler M GoodwinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Florida International University/Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Aaron DavidsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Florida International University/Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Frantz R LereboursDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Florida International University/Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Bashir A ZikriaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
Anthony MiniaciDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Florida International University/Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Derek F PappDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Florida International University/Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although biomechanical studies show increased load to failure and less gap formation with double-row rotator cuff repair, clinical outcome scores do not necessarily favor double-row rotator cuff repair over single-row repair. Some studies report higher retear rates with single-row repair versus double-row repair, especially with larger tears, but these results do not include orthobiologic augmentation. Single-row repairs with multiple sutures, emphasizing biologic augmentation by venting the proximal humerus, show excellent healing rates and patient satisfaction. Although much of the rotator cuff biologic augmentation literature focuses on scaffolds placed over the cuff, demineralized bone matrix scaffolds at the footprint can promote enhanced healing at the enthesis. This technical note describes a single-row technique that uses demineralized bone fiber scaffolds to augment rotator cuff biologic healing at the enthesis.

Identifiers

PMID41425358
PMCPMC12712495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.