Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425307›Full record

ArticleACS measurement science au2025

Determination of Rose Alcohol Composition in Extracts and Flowers via Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction and GC-MS.

Amber M Hupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS measurement science au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amber M HuppThe College of the Holy Cross, 1 College St, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-2619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural extracts of rose are frequently subject to adulteration due to their high production costs and strong demand within the flavor and fragrance industry. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) serves as a critical analytical tool for detecting adulterants and quantifying the relative concentrations of key rose alcohols. In this study, rose fragrances were analyzed by using GC-MS to assess compositional integrity. Standard accords consisted of six synthetic compounds with varying molecular weights, boiling points, and polarities, commonly found in rose essential oils and perfumes. Each component was baseline resolved on a nonpolar column and detectable at low concentrations (3-5%). Calibration curves were developed for phenyl ethyl alcohol, citronellol, and geraniol based on representative concentrations in commercial samples. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to further characterize and differentiate the accords according to their chemical profiles. Additionally, headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was used to sample the volatile profile of each sample on a fragrance strip. Several commercial samples, including two natural rose extracts (absolute and oil) and a commercial perfume, and a peony flower, were analyzed using liquid direct injection and/or HS-SPME. These results demonstrate the utility of GC-MS and HS-SPME for both quantitative and qualitative analysis of rose alcohols in complex fragrance matrices.

Indexed as

gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS)headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME)principal component analysis (PCA)rose alcoholsrose fragrance

Identifiers

PMID41425307
PMCPMC12715635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.