Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425296›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2025

Photodynamic therapy dosimetry: current status and the emerging challenge of immune stimulation.

Brian C Wilson, Lothar Lilge, Robert A Weersink, Layla Pires

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Redox processes in the treatment of advanced skin cancers.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian C WilsonUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Research Institute Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-666X
Lothar LilgeUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Research Institute Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-0005
Robert A WeersinkUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medical Biophysics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-7288
Layla PiresTexas A&M University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Addressing the challenges of accurate dosimetry in photodynamic therapy has motivated some of the earliest work in tissue optics, which then enabled the broader development of biomedical optics. Inadequate use of dosimetry-informed treatments may contribute to heterogeneity in tumor response and variable clinical outcomes that need to be addressed. Aim: This perspective paper seeks to understand the current status of photodynamic therapy (PDT) dosimetry in preclinical and clinical applications and identify opportunities for improvement. We also identify the "elephant in the room" of photodynamic immune stimulation that presents additional dosimetry challenges and opportunities. Approach: The origins of PDT dosimetry based on biophysical metrics are considered, and major scientific and technological advances that have underpinned biological and clinical studies are highlighted. The question is posed: "Has the inadequacy of dosimetry for PDT been a major factor in this treatment not achieving widespread adoption into clinical practice, particularly in oncology?" It may be the case that, in the clinic and also frequently in preclinical (especially, Results: Different clinical situations require different PDT dosimetry approaches, depending on medical complexity and technical dosimetry requirements. Conclusions: This article is not a comprehensive review, but rather intended to recognize past advances and current limitations, and to stimulate discussion of future directions in PDT dosimetry. Inadequate dosimetry may be a potential impediment to PDT adoption and may have contributed to the failure of some previous and ongoing clinical trials.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyRadiometryAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsPhotosensitizing AgentsPhotosensitizing Agentsdosimetryoncologyphotochemical immune stimulationphotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID41425296
PMCPMC12715725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.