Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425280›Full record

ArticleDigital health

DepGLM: Depression degree recognition on social media based on large language models.

Jingfang Liu, Peng Ding, Jie Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingfang LiuSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-1268
Peng DingSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3013-7744
Jie ChenSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9152-0434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression is recognized as one of the most prevalent mental health disorders globally. Early detection and intervention can significantly reduce its negative impact on patients. Data from social media platforms provide new opportunities for early warning, intervention, and support for individuals with depression. However, traditional discriminative methods are limited in both the accuracy and interpretability of depression identification. Most studies focus on binary classification tasks, lacking more fine-grained identification. Methods: We model depression degree recognition as a multi-level text classification task and a multi-level text generation task, exploring more fine-grained identification in the Chinese context. We construct the depression degree ((Depression Weibo) dataset and the first multi-level interpretable depression degree instruction dataset. Based on these datasets and ChatGLM3, a Chinese open-source large language model, we train DepGLM. We also compare how fine-tuned large language models perform against multiple baseline models across different tasks. Results: The results show that the text classification model, DepGLM-tc, demonstrates superior accuracy compared to current state-of-the-art (SOTA) discriminative approaches, achieving a weighted F1 score of 84%. Meanwhile, the text generation model, DepGLM-tg, approaches the accuracy of SOTA discriminative methods and is capable of generating high-quality explanations comparable to ChatGPT. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that large language models fine-tuned for specific domains more accurately identify depression degree. Moreover, our model demonstrates enhanced performance in classification tasks.

Indexed as

depression degree recognitionLarge language modelssocial mediatext classificationtext generation

Identifiers

PMID41425280
PMCPMC12712314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.