Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425278›Full record

ReviewDigital health

A systematic review of automated International Classification of Diseases coding models using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care dataset.

Ying Zhang, Chen Lyu, Lu Chang, Hong Yang, Bin Ji, Ling-Yun Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ying ZhangDepartment of Medical Record, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Chen LyuSchool of Interpreting and Translation Studies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China.
Lu ChangDepartment of Medical Record, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Hong YangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin JiCollege of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China.
Ling-Yun WeiDepartment of Medical Information, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-830X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the development of automated International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding models using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) dataset. This work integrates computer science and clinical perspectives to evaluate progress, identify challenges, and provide insights for future ICD coding automation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We selected 73 studies between 2014 and 2024 and extracted key information about data preprocessing, knowledge integration, model architectures, evaluation strategies, and explainability. Results: In the reviewed papers, 69.57% (48 papers) focused on utilizing medical knowledge, primarily through knowledge graphs. The methods have evolved from traditional machine learning techniques to more advanced approaches, such as deep learning, knowledge reasoning, information retrieval, and generative models. Since 2019, F1-micro scores have consistently improved: Studies using the MIMIC-III full dataset have shown a 6.4% increase, while those using the MIMIC-III top-50 dataset have experienced a 10.2% improvement. Furthermore, 60.27% (44 papers) implemented strategies to enhance explainability, which included attention visualization and analysis. Conclusion: Automated ICD coding tasks have improved, but ongoing challenges remain. These challenges include a lack of diverse data, inadequate use of medical knowledge, complex algorithms, and insufficient validation by clinical coders. Those issues obstruct the model implementation. Future research should focus on integrating a wider range of multimodal data, enhancing the application of medical knowledge, and improving the explainability of models.

Indexed as

Automated International Classification of Diseases codinghealthcare applicabilityMedical Information Mart for Intensive Care datasetmodel explainabilitymulti-label classification

Identifiers

PMID41425278
PMCPMC12712315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.