ArticleFrontiers in sleep2025
Exploring the biological function of dreaming: lessons learned from recruitment challenges in a pilot study with PCA stroke patients.
Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04749992 (Biological Function of Dreaming - Declarative and Non-declarative Memory Consolidation and Sleep Quality in Dreaming and Non-dreaming Patients With PCA Infarction), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biological Function of Dreaming - Declarative and Non-declarative Memory Consolidation and Sleep Quality in Dreaming and Non-dreaming Patients With PCA Infarction
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This methodological report draws conclusions about a study that aimed to investigate the biological function of dreams. The main hypothesis in the study posited that dreams serve to maintain sleep by hallucinatory wish fulfillment in response to affect-laden impulses. A secondary hypothesis was whether dreams contribute to the consolidation of non-declarative memory. Neurological patients with ischemic stroke of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA stroke) served as a pragmatic lesion model for loss of dreaming ability, following evidence on the importance of parieto-occipital cortical areas for dream formation. Methods: This quasi-experimental, two-arm controlled study intended to assess sleep quality and non-verbal memory consolidation in participants with PCA stroke who lost dreaming ability, compared to PCA stroke patients with preserved dreaming. Descriptive statistics using morbidity variables (e.g., NIHSS, Barthel-Index, and thrombolysis) were conducted to assess recruitment challenges. Results: Recruitment was significantly constrained due to inclusion criteria and multimorbidity of the study population. Of 255 patients screened, 14 were included, and 6 completed the study. Descriptive data from the 14 inclusions as well as reasons for exclusion and dropouts are reported. Morbidity variables varied substantially between completers and non-completers, indicating that PCA stroke might not be an appropriate lesion model for dream research. Conclusion: This methodological report highlights the difficulties in recruiting adequate patient samples for dream research within a stroke lesion model, in order to gain valuable insights into methodological obstacles in this field. Solutions to these challenges are proposed, e.g., using functional lesion models in healthy controls with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04749992).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.