ArticleFrontiers in sleep2025
Comparison of self-reported sleep sufficiency and accelerometer-measured sleep duration in relation to mental health, physical health, and life satisfaction.
Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects on 24-h physical behaviors and heart rate variability during sleep of a co-created workplace intervention to promote recovery in office workers with flexible work.Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sleep is crucial for health and wellbeing, but different dimensions of sleep may affect health differently. This cross-sectional study explores the associations of self-reported sleep sufficiency and accelerometer-measured sleep duration with mental health, physical health, and life satisfaction. Materials and methods: Data from 1,022 individuals (age ≥16 years) from the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey in 2023 were used. Mental and physical health were assessed using the SF-12 questionnaire, and life satisfaction with the Cantril Ladder scale. Multiple adjusted linear regression models were used to examine associations separately and in four combined categories: (1) low sufficiency, <7/>9 h ( Results: Deviations from recommended sleep durations (<7 or >9 h) and low sleep sufficiency were associated with poorer mental health, physical health and life satisfaction, most strongly for mental health and life satisfaction. Specifically, individuals sleeping 7-9 h with low perceived sleep sufficiency had mental health scores of 10.9 points (95% CI: -13.2; -8.6) lower than those sleeping 7-9 h and reporting high sleep sufficiency. Similarly, those sleeping <7/>9 h and reporting low sleep sufficiency had mental health scores 8.5 points (95% CI: -10.8; -6.3) lower. Conclusion: Regardless of sleep duration, low sleep sufficiency was consistently associated with poorer health outcomes, suggesting that self-reported sleep sufficiency may be more correlated to health than accelerometer-measured sleep duration alone. These findings underscore the need to integrate multiple sleep dimensions and measurement strategies into public health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.