ArticleFrontiers in sleep2025
Evaluating the Insomnia Severity Index among South African first responders: evidence from classical test theory, Rasch, and Mokken analyses.
Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep is essential for physical health and psychological wellbeing, and insomnia is strongly associated with mental health difficulties, including depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Among first responders, the prevalence of insomnia is particularly high due to chronic exposure to stress, trauma, and irregular work hours. Aim: As part of a broader study focusing on the mental health of first responders in South Africa, the current study examined the psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index from three different psychometric perspectives: classical test theory, Rasch analysis and Mokken scale analysis. Methods: Participants were first responders ( Results: The three psychometric paradigms converged to confirm that the ISI measures a unidimensional scale. Furthermore, all three paradigms provided evidence for the construct validity of the ISI. In addition, classical test theory indices provided evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Lastly, the correlations between insomnia as measured by the ISI and depression, anxiety, and fatigue provided evidence for concurrent validity. Conclusion: These findings affirm that the ISI is a stable and sound tool for assessing insomnia severity within the first responder population. The absence of measurement bias across gender and professional roles also enhances the practical utility of the ISI, as it ensures equitable assessment across subgroups within the first responder workforce. The ISI emerges from this study as a valuable resource for clinicians, researchers, and occupational health professionals working with South African first responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.