ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Experimental and numerical replication of blunt ballistic impact on a male thorax surrogate: study of rib fractures and lung injuries predictions.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Verification and optimization of impact-response consistency in human thoracic targets for blunt ballistic impact testing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediction of body injuries caused by non-penetrating ballistic impacts is a major challenge. Experiments on biological models are difficult to conduct due to ethical and logistical constraints and on the data that can be collected. These limitations can be overcome by using surrogates, but their results must be correlated with real injuries recorded by ballistic injury databases. The objective of this study is to establish injury prediction curves for rib fractures and lung injuries. Several ballistic impact scenarios from French and American police reports were analyzed. These cases were recreated experimentally using a biofidelic thoracic surrogate, SurHUByx, and numerically using its numerical twin, SurHUByx FEM. These surrogates represent the thorax of a 50th percentile male and were designed to reproduce the biomechanical responses of the human body to ballistic impacts. Then a scaling process adjusted the data according to body mass index to account for individual variability. The optimal cutoff for injury diagnosis was determined using the Youden method. And the injury risk curves were constructed using survival analysis according to ISO guidelines. The results show the risk of injuries according to rib deformation and pulmonary pressure over time. The injury probability was also plotted against the backface deformation. For a standard 44 mm intrusion, the risk of rib fracture was 44.84% and lung injury was 52.45%. These results highlight the limitations of current body armour standards, which may underestimate the probability of internal injuries. This study highlights the value of sharing ballistic injury cases to build a more reliable database. It also highlights the use of surrogates to replicate cases in order to develop injury prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.