Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425058›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025

Mahrukh Javed, Mehmood Asghar, Zainab Qasim Butt, Saood Khan Lodhi, Shahzad Ahmad, Muhammad Amber Fareed, Muhammad Kaleem

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahrukh JavedDepartment of Basic Dental Sciences, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Mehmood AsgharDepartment of Basic Dental Sciences, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Zainab Qasim ButtDepartment of Basic Dental Sciences, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Saood Khan LodhiFMH College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shahzad AhmadFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Buckingham, Buckingham, United Kingdom.
Muhammad Amber FareedClinical Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Muhammad KaleemDepartment of Basic Dental Sciences, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the bracket failure of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded with two different adhesives using the conventional shear bond test and a custom-made toothbrush simulator. Methods: Forty-eight bovine teeth were extracted, bracketed, pH-cycled (14 days), randomly divided into four groups: metallic brackets bonded with B&E bonding agent (MB) and OrthoVita (MO), and ceramic brackets bonded with the B&E (CB) and the OrthoVita (CO). The bracket failure was evaluated with a universal testing machine (UTM) and a custom-made toothbrush simulator (TBS) ( Results: The mean values of shear bond strengths (± SE) were MB 58.32 ± 4.48 MPa, MO 22.57 ± 5.64 MPa, CB 27.36 ± 2.66 MPa, and lastly, CO 12.54 ± 3.64 MPa ( Conclusion: Metallic brackets and B&E Universal adhesive showed superior results. MB proved to have the strongest bonding comparatively.

Indexed as

bonding agentdebondingorthodontic adhesivesorthodontic bracketsshear bond strengthtoothbrush simulator

Identifiers

PMID41425058
PMCPMC12714883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.