Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425052›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

The Test Pyramid 2.0: AI-assisted testing across the pyramid.

Priyank Desai, Snahil Singh, Shubham Amilkanthwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Priyank DesaiIndependent Researcher, Seattle, WA, United States.
Snahil SinghIndependent Researcher, Seattle, WA, United States.
Shubham AmilkanthwarIndependent Researcher, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring robust test coverage, high code quality, and a strong security posture are persistent challenges in modern industrial software development, especially as systems grow in complexity and release cycles accelerate with recent Artificial Intelligence (AI) related productivity gains. This paper introduces a conceptual framework, "The Test Pyramid 2.0", which offers a clear and actionable path to integrate the latest advances in AI and DevSecOps principles into engineering workflows to achieve greater efficiency, reduce defect leakage, and create more resilient systems. We examine how AI enhances each layer of the test pyramid through capabilities such as automated test generation, coverage analysis, test data synthesis, anomaly detection, and intelligent UI exploration. In parallel, we embed DevSecOps practices directly into the pyramid by aligning security controls with each testing layer, ranging from static analysis and policy enforcement to dynamic testing, misconfiguration detection, and adversarial simulation. We also explore how AI strengthens these security practices through adaptive learning, risk prioritization, and context-aware detection. Together, these advances create a holistic, AI-augmented, and security-conscious testing strategy that supports the speed of modern development without compromising quality or safety.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecontinuous integrationDevSecOpsquality assurancesecurity testingshift leftsoftware testing

Identifiers

PMID41425052
PMCPMC12713685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.