ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Development and Validation of a Self-Perception Tool for Measuring Nurse Managers' Crisis Leadership.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Self-Perception Tool for Measuring Nurse Managers' Crisis Leadership.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During crises, nurse managers' leadership can significantly affect the quality of nursing care. Therefore, we aimed to develop a crisis leadership tool for nursing managers. This study involved nurse managers from 34 hospitals in South Korea. The crisis leadership tool was developed by reviewing the relevant literature and existing measurement tools. Five factors were identified through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with confirmatory factor analysis showing goodness of fit (comparative fit index = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.91, root mean square error of approximation = 0.07, standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.02). The final tool comprised 28 items across five factors: "crisis management competency" (12 items), "decision-making" (6 items), "collaboration" (4 items), "communication" (3 items), and "building trust" (3 items), all organized on a 5-point Likert scale. The tool's Cronbach's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.