ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Examining Nurses' Views on Positive Clinical Working Environments Integrating With Their Religious Beliefs and Determining Their Metaphors: Qualitative Research.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining Nurses' Views on Positive Clinical Working Environments Integrating With Their Religious Beliefs and Determining Their Metaphors: Qualitative Research.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to examine nurses' views on positive clinical work environments integrated with their religious beliefs and to determine their metaphors. Method: The study population consisted of nurses working in a university hospital in eastern Turkey between May 6 and 16, 2025. The study sample consisted of 41 nurses who agreed to participate. The criterion sampling method was used. The research data were collected using the "Introductory Information Form" and "Semistructured Questionnaire." Content analysis was used to evaluate qualitative data, and descriptive statistical methods (frequency, percentage, and mean) were used to evaluate quantitative data. This study followed the COREQ checklist. Results: The analysis of data obtained from interviews with nurses resulted in the creation of 3 themes and 18 codes: "The Impact of Religious Beliefs on Professional and Team Relationships," "The Impact of Religious Beliefs on Coping with Clinical Challenges," and "The Impact of Religious Beliefs on a Positive Clinical Environment." The nurses' metaphors regarding their religious beliefs and their profession were divided into three different categories based on their common characteristics. Twenty-three different metaphors were created for these categories. Conclusion: This study highlights, for the first time, how nurses' religious beliefs shape their perceptions of a positive clinical work environment. The findings demonstrate that these beliefs influence professional relationships, coping strategies, and the overall atmosphere of the workplace. In addition to contributing to the literature, the results have managerial relevance: acknowledging and respecting employees' individual values can foster motivation, cooperation, and resilience, while also enhancing job satisfaction and the quality of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.