ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Routine Nasobiliary Cholangiography After ERCP for Choledocholithiasis May Be Unnecessary: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the necessity of routine nasobiliary cholangiography (NBC) after Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct stones (CBDS) by comparing outcomes between patients with and without post-ERCP NBC. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ERCP with CBDS extraction between January 2021 and June 2024. We compared the outcomes of patients who underwent NBC versus those who did not receive NBC after ERCP for CBDS extraction. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of residual stones (detected within≤6 months). Secondary outcomes included recurrence of CBDS (more than 6 months), hospitalization duration, antibiotic use duration, and overall cost. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors, reported with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The overall residual stone rate was 5.2% (16/308). The residual stone rate was 7.1% (10/141) in the NBC group, compared to 3.6% (6/167) in the no-NBC group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.168). Post-ERCP NBC significantly increased costs (p<0.01). Large stone diameter (OR=5.48, 95% CI: 1.16-25.87) was an independent predictor for residual stones. Conclusion: Routine NBC after ERCP for CBDS may not be necessary as it did not reduce residual stone rates but increased costs. NBC should be considered selectively for patients with large stone diameter (>11.06 mm) or multiple stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.