Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424972›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025

Routine Nasobiliary Cholangiography After ERCP for Choledocholithiasis May Be Unnecessary: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Zi Yan, Yumei Ning, Zhi An, Qiu Zhao, Jun Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zi Yan *Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Yumei Ning *Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Zhi AnDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Qiu ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3230-6077
Jun FangHubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the necessity of routine nasobiliary cholangiography (NBC) after Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct stones (CBDS) by comparing outcomes between patients with and without post-ERCP NBC. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ERCP with CBDS extraction between January 2021 and June 2024. We compared the outcomes of patients who underwent NBC versus those who did not receive NBC after ERCP for CBDS extraction. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of residual stones (detected within≤6 months). Secondary outcomes included recurrence of CBDS (more than 6 months), hospitalization duration, antibiotic use duration, and overall cost. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors, reported with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The overall residual stone rate was 5.2% (16/308). The residual stone rate was 7.1% (10/141) in the NBC group, compared to 3.6% (6/167) in the no-NBC group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.168). Post-ERCP NBC significantly increased costs (p<0.01). Large stone diameter (OR=5.48, 95% CI: 1.16-25.87) was an independent predictor for residual stones. Conclusion: Routine NBC after ERCP for CBDS may not be necessary as it did not reduce residual stone rates but increased costs. NBC should be considered selectively for patients with large stone diameter (>11.06 mm) or multiple stones.

Indexed as

common bile duct stonescost-benefit analysispostoperative imagingresidual stonesstone recurrence

Identifiers

PMID41424972
PMCPMC12716068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.