Comparison of early bone union between anterior and posterior approach in periacetabular osteotomy: spherical periacetabular osteotomy and rotational acetabular osteotomy.

Hironori Kitajima, Eiji Takahashi, Makoto Fukui, Yusuke Sanji, Daisuke Soma, Toru Ichiseki, Ayumi Kaneuji

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Manuscript reviews-an evolving challenge.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hironori KitajimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5285-9429

Eiji TakahashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.

Makoto FukuiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.

Yusuke SanjiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.

Daisuke SomaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.

Toru IchisekiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.

Ayumi KaneujiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spherical Periacetabular Osteotomy (SPO) is a novel procedure using an osteotomy line similar to that for Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy (RAO). The major difference between these procedures is that an anterior approach is used for SPO and an anterior and posterior approach for RAO. This study compared early bone union between these procedures. We enrolled 12 patients (12 hips) post-RAO and 15 patients (15 hips) post-SPO who consented to undergo computed tomography (CT) imaging about 5 weeks after surgery. Results showed no significant differences in lateral centre-edge angle or acetabular roof obliquity between these groups, both before and after surgery. Partial bone union was observed in 7 of 12 cases (58.3%) in the RAO group and 14 of 15 cases (93.3%) in the SPO group, with the SPO group showing a significantly higher incidence of bone union (

Identifiers

PMID41424959

DOI10.1093/jhps/hnaf024

PMCPMC12712962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.