Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424935›Full record

ReviewBlood neoplasia2025

How to drug a leukemic stem cell: deciphering heterogeneity for better specificity.

Alice Worker, Nicholas Jinks, Peter Woodmancy, Claire Seedhouse, Sophie G Kellaway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alice WorkerBlood Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nicholas JinksBlood Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Peter WoodmancyBlood Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Claire SeedhouseBlood Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sophie G KellawayBlood Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood cancers, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), are becoming increasingly common due to an aging population but remain challenging to treat. Relapse is the most important singular cause of treatment failure in AML, and up to half of patients relapse after chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. Relapse in AML is primarily due to a population of quiescent leukemic stem cells (LSCs) that shelter in the bone marrow. Chemotherapy hits actively proliferating AML blasts, but LSCs escape and can later re-enter the cell cycle to regenerate the leukemia. LSCs resemble hematopoietic stem cells, but variable and unique differences may allow for LSC-specific treatment. In this review, we summarize the unique biology of LSCs, considering both global and subtype-specific traits. We describe how heterogeneity, both between different AML subtypes and within the LSC compartment, has impaired efforts to find drug targets so far and how this is being resolved with technological advances such as single-cell sequencing. We elucidate which aspects of LSC biology determine possibilities for targeted treatment and the progress so far made toward therapies to prevent or treat relapse.

Identifiers

PMID41424935
PMCPMC12711684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.