ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Development of the PRACTIC Goal Setting Interview (PGSI) for Frail Community-Dwelling Patients. Feasibility, Interrater Reliability and Content validity-a Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05651659 (Preventing and Approaching Crises for Frail Community-dwelling Patients Through Innovative Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preventing and Approaching Crises for Frail Community-dwelling Patients Through Innovative Care (PRACTIC) - an Effectiveness Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Goal-setting interviews in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), such as the Bangor Goal-Setting Interview (BGSI), provide personalised, measurable outcomes that are meaningful to participants because they reflect their unique needs. The PRACTIC (PReventing and Approaching Crises for frail community-dwelling patients Through Innovative Care) RCT (2023-2024) evaluates a biopsychosocial intervention to approach and prevent crises for frail community-dwelling patients. The PRACTIC Goal Setting Interview (PGSI), adapted from the BGSI, focuses on individual goal attainment and readiness to change and was chosen as the primary outcome in the PRACTIC RCT. This study aimed to translate and develop the PGSI, exploring its feasibility, content validity and interrater reliability. Design and Methods: This study used a convergent mixed-method design; quantitative and qualitative data were collected with equal priority, analysed separately, and compiled for the results and discussion. Two substudies are included: 1) translation and development of the BGSI towards the PGSI and 2) feasibility, content validity and interrater reliability of the PGSI. Results: The PGSI was well received in the home care services and helped strengthen patient involvement. However, there were challenges in using the PGSI, such as time pressure and workload for the staff. After 12 weeks, participants with high motivation showed a significant increase in PGSI compared with those with low motivation (p = 0.010). Analyses also revealed strong positive correlations between participants and staff members assessments of goal attainment at 12 weeks (Spearman's Conclusion: The PGSI appears to be a useful and feasible tool for goal setting in home care services. The tool strengthens patient engagement and goal attainment with high content validity and interrater reliability. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05651659. Registration date: 07.12.22.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.