ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Non-pressurized percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy in the treatment of cauda equina syndrome caused by lumbar disc herniation.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but devastating condition in spine surgery. There are various surgical decompression methods, but the clinical outcomes are not always satisfactory. We introduce the surgical technique of non-pressurized percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETD) technique in the treatment of cauda equina syndrome caused by lumbar disc herniation, and to evaluate its clinical efficacy compared to traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 51 cases diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation complicated by cauda equina syndrome. They were divided into two groups, 23 cases in the PETD group and 28 cases in the TLIF group. The surgical procedure and technical details of non-pressurized PETD technique were described. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the cauda scale (TCS) were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. Significant improvements were observed at the final follow-up in both PETD and TLIF groups. The VAS for low back pain and ODI at discharge were lower in the PETD group than those in the TLIF group (both Conclusion: In this preliminary retrospective study, the non-pressurized PETD technique was associated with similar medium-term outcomes and a faster short-term recovery compared to TLIF. These findings require validation in larger, prospective, randomized controlled trials to establish comparative efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.