Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424822›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2025

Robust contactless fingerprint authentication using dolphin optimization and SVM hybridization.

Jenisha Rachel, Ezhilmaran Devarasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenisha RachelDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.
Ezhilmaran DevarasanDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of contactless fingerprint (CLFP) recognition is rapidly evolving, driven by its potential to offer enhanced hygiene and user convenience over traditional touch-based systems without compromising security. This study introduces a contactless fingerprint recognition system using the Dolphin Optimization Algorithm (DOA), a nature-inspired technique suited for complex optimization tasks. The Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) method is applied to reduce image features, with DOA optimizing the feature selection process. To boost prediction accuracy, we fused the DOA with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier, creating a hybrid (DOA-SVM) that leverages the global search prowess of DOA alongside the reliable classification strength of SVM. Additionally, two more hybrid models are proposed: one combining Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) with DOA-SVM, and another combining Neutrosophic C-Means (NCM) with DOA-SVM. Experimental validation on 504 contactless fingerprint images from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University dataset demonstrates a clear performance progression: DOA (91.00%), DOA-SVM (94.07%), FCM-DOA-SVM (96.03%), and NCM-DOA-SVM (98.00%). The NCM-DOA-SVM approach achieves superior accuracy through effective uncertainty handling via neutrosophic logic while maintaining competitive processing efficiency. Comparative analysis with other bio-inspired methods shows our approach achieves higher accuracy with reduced computational requirements. These results highlight the effectiveness of combining bio-inspired optimization with traditional classifiers and advanced clustering for biometric recognition.

Indexed as

clusteringcontactless fingerprintdolphin optimization algorithmfeature extractionHOG algorithmmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41424822
PMCPMC12715523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.