ArticleJournal of cancer prevention2025
A Qualitative Study of Staff and Provider Experiences with Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Community Health Center and Gastroenterology Specialty.
Article in Journal of cancer prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer screening is an effective strategy to prevent disease, reduce the risk of advanced-stage diagnosis, and improve survival. Timely follow-up of abnormal screening results, particularly abnormal fecal immunochemical tests, is essential to realizing these benefits. This qualitative study examined routine processes related to colonoscopy referral and completion for patients of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) referred to community gastroenterology (GI) practices. Using a snowball sampling approach, five FQHC individuals and eight community GI practice individuals were interviewed. Interviews at the FQHC were conducted between March 2020 and September 2021, during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Due to clinic closures and other pandemic-related disruptions, GI practice interviews occurred between August 2021 and January 2023. Study findings highlight the need for improved communication and collaboration between primary care and GI practices to support colonoscopy completion among low resource populations. Interviewees also offered recommendations to ensure colonoscopy completion. Further research is needed to pilot test centralized referral and scheduling systems and to develop multicomponent interventions that address both patient and organizational barriers to colonoscopy completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.