ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Machine learning-based prediction model for teicoplanin plasma concentrations in adults with liver disease using real-world data.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based model for predicting teicoplanin plasma concentrations in intensive care unit patients with pulmonary infections: a retrospective study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To construct a prediction model for teicoplanin (TEIC) plasma concentrations through machine learning and deep learning techniques in patients with liver disease using real-world clinical data. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent TEIC therapeutic drug monitoring at a tertiary hospital in China (January 2019-March 2025). Dataset was split into training and test sets (8:2 ratio). Feature selection combined univariate analysis and algorithm importance ranking. Missing values were imputed using random forest (RF) model. Ten machine learning algorithms, such as RF, TransTab and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), were employed for model development, with predictive performance evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation on the training set. The optimal model was validated its predictive performance on the test set. Results: A total of 646 patients (689 TEIC concentrations) were eligible. Key variables were daily dose, hemoglobin (HGB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin (ALB), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), indirect bilirubin (IBIL), total bilirubin (TBIL), platelet count (PLT), urea and direct bilirubin (DBIL). LightGBM demonstrated superior predictive performance among ten algorithms, with a RMSE of 2.90, a R Conclusion: The LightGBM-based model integrating clinical covariates demonstrated robust predictive capability for TEIC plasma concentrations in liver disease. This tool provides real-world evidence to optimize TEIC dosing, advancing individualized treatment strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.