Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424744›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Article processing charges and health research output in low-income countries: funding cuts, implications for health policy and system management.

Stanley Chinedu Eneh, Francisca Ogochukwu Onukansi, Chidera Gabriel Obi, Collins Chibueze Anokwuru, Ogechi Vinaprisca Ikhuoria, Chioma Adaora Nwalieji, Moses Ifeatu Nwuzoh, Onyeka Chukwudalu Ekwebene, Ephraim Ikpongifono Udokang, Okoli Chukwudinma Chigozie and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stanley Chinedu EnehDepartment of Community Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Osun, Nigeria.
Francisca Ogochukwu OnukansiYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Chidera Gabriel ObiYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Collins Chibueze AnokwuruYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ogechi Vinaprisca IkhuoriaYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Chioma Adaora NwaliejiYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Moses Ifeatu NwuzohYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Onyeka Chukwudalu EkwebeneYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ephraim Ikpongifono UdokangYouth in Research Hub, Enugu, Nigeria.
Okoli Chukwudinma ChigozieFCT Medical Lab Services, Hospitals Management Board, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ugonma Winnie DozieDepartment of Public Health, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Owerri, Nigeria.
Temitope Olumuyiwa OjoDepartment of Community Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Osun, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Article processing charges (APCs) pose a material barrier to the dissemination of health research from low income countries where recent funding cuts compound limited domestic financing and fragile health systems. Despite carrying a disproportionate share of global disease, these settings contribute under one percent of global research publications. This Perspective piece explores how APCs and funding cuts intersect to shape research output, summarises mitigation efforts and gaps, and proposes practical options for more equitable access to scholarly publishing. APCs are reported to shape venue choice for researchers in low income countries, while reduced external funding leaves fewer upstream resources to absorb costs. Country examples point to institutional and capacity pressures. Early career researchers often face disproportionate obstacles including slower progression and reduced competitiveness. Waiver policies and regional initiatives such as AJOL, SciELO South Africa and AfricArXiv offer partial relief, yet inconsistencies in eligibility, awareness and implementation persist with ethical implications. A rights and equity oriented response would include tiered APC models, automatic waivers linked to country income classification, ring fenced support for health research in low income settings, greater investment and independent evaluation of diamond open access platforms, and focused research on the effects of funding cuts on APCs and dissemination in low income contexts.

Indexed as

article processing charges (APCs)diamond open access modelsglobal knowledge inequalityhealth research equitylow-income countries (LICs)open-access publishingresearch funding cuts

Identifiers

PMID41424744
PMCPMC12711709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.