Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424729›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2025

Predicting blood pressure variability in hemodialysis using an explainable boosting machine model.

Wun-Yi Huang, Cheng-Jui Lin, Yu-Xiang Zheng, Hung-Ting Chen, Fang-Ju Sun, Chih-Jen Wu, Kun-Pin Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wun-Yi HuangInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0990-6734
Cheng-Jui LinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Xiang ZhengInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-Ting ChenDepartment of Information Technology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Fang-Ju SunDepartment of Medical Research, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Jen WuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kun-Pin WuInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intradialytic hypotension and hypertension significantly increase cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients, highlighting the need for effective monitoring systems. By predicting systolic blood pressure (SBP) values, monitoring capabilities can be improved beyond traditional event classification. Despite this potential advantage, current predictive models report a consistent error range (11-13 mmHg) and operate as black boxes. This study aims to develop a transparent SBP prediction model and evaluate its generalizability. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 524 patients across metropolitan and suburban hospital branches (2016-19), collecting hemodialysis parameters, vital signs and predialytic measurements. The Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) was used as the primary model to predict SBP changes. Cross-branch validation was implemented to evaluate model generalizability and perform feature selection. The EBM model was then compared with five other common machine learning methods. Results: EBM with 16 dynamic features achieved competitive performance compared with other machine learning methods (mean absolute error: 10.57-11.33 mmHg, Pearson's r: 0.80-0.83) in cross-validation between branches. A waterfall plot visualized the model's additive scoring process, showing how each feature quantitatively contributes to the final SBP prediction. Error analysis of the models revealed strong positive correlations (Pearson's r: 0.81-0.87) between patients' blood pressure variability and prediction errors. Conclusions: The EBM models demonstrated excellent cross-branch generalizability while providing feature-level transparency that reflects clinical understanding of dialysis physiology, unlike black-box models that require additional post-hoc explanation methods such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). These findings provide a foundation for developing patient-specific solutions for individuals with highly variable blood pressure patterns.

Indexed as

blood pressureexplainable artificial intelligencehemodialysisintradialytic hypotensionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41424729
PMCPMC12712476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.