ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Preimplantation genetic testing for cardiomyopathies: a case series illustrating the clinical and technological perspective.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is increasingly used in patients with inherited cardiac disease. Technological advances have expanded its applicability, yet the process remains highly individualized and complex. Case summary: We present a case series of four patients undergoing PGT for various cardiogenetic disorders. The cases illustrate technical developments evolving from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to whole genome sequencing (WGS). Each case highlights distinct aspects of the PGT process to illustrate the steps: (i) the variability in disease penetrance, (ii) the clinical decision-making process, (iii) the duration and timeline of the trajectory, and (iv) the sequencing methodology. Discussion: These cases emphasize the importance of selecting patients who will benefit the greatest risk reduction from PGT, reflecting the significance of individual assessment per couple. Additionally, clinicians should be aware and discuss the possibility of PGT with eligible patients consistently to ensure a comprehensive understanding of their reproductive options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.