ReviewRegenerative therapy2025
Harnessing stromal vascular fraction-based therapies for wound healing: Mechanisms, synergies, and clinical translation.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Platelet-Rich Plasma in a Refractory Venous Leg Ulcer Following Multiple Failed Skin Grafts.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Stromal Vascular Fraction Across Different Clinical Indications: A Pro-RegenerativeJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Combined Stromal Vascular Fraction and HGF-Functionalized Self-Assembling Peptide Hydrogel Improves Intracerebral Hemorrhage Repair in Rats.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of the efficacy of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction and calcium phosphate bone cement combined with core decompression in patients with femoral head necrosis: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing remains a major challenge in contemporary medicine, particularly with the increasing incidence of chronic wounds, such as those associated with diabetes and thermal injuries. Current treatments such as vacuum sealing drainage, topical therapies, and autologous skin grafting are limited by issues like poor therapeutic efficacy, frequent dressing changes, and immune responses. Cell-based therapies have shown promise but are hindered by single-cell type limitations and hostile wound microenvironments. The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) has emerged as a potential solution, where the enzymatic digestion (E-SVF) contains various cell types, including adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), endothelial cells, and fibroblasts, while mechanical digestion (M-SVF) introduces additional extracellular matrix (ECM), termed stromal vascular matrix (SVM). This review systematically evaluates the applications of SVF and SVM in wound healing. SVF promotes wound repair through proangiogenic, immunomodulatory, and ECM remodeling effects. When combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or biomaterials, its efficacy is further enhanced through the synergistic regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis. SVM, with preserved ECM, and SVM-conditioned medium (SVM-CM), rich in growth factors, demonstrate superior wound healing capabilities compared to conventional SVF. Despite the challenges posed by impaired viability and function of aged SVF-derived ADSCs and the low mechanical properties of SVM, emerging technologies, such as 3D cell cultures to enhance stemness and the integration of other biomaterials to improve mechanical strength, offer promising solutions. This review highlights the potential of SVF as an autologous, multifunctional strategy to address unmet needs in wound healing and provides insights into future clinical applications and research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.