Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424576›Full record

ReviewMedicine international

Artificial intelligence in modern clinical practice (Review).

Krupa Sara Thomas, Sudeep Edpuganti, Divina Mariya Puthooran, Angela Thomas, Angel Joy, Shifna Latheef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Krupa Sara ThomasDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia.
Sudeep EdpugantiDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia.
Divina Mariya PuthooranDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia.
Angela ThomasDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia.
Angel JoyDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia.
Shifna LatheefDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its inception as rule-based programs, artificial intelligence (AI) has developed into machine learning and deep learning systems that utilize the enormous volumes of clinical data currently accessible. The aim of the present review was to discuss the role of AI in modern clinical practice and to highlight the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead by combining the results of recent research. AI tools provide physicians with decision support and prediction models, directs robotic procedures and surgical planning, supports radiologists, pathologists, dermatologists and ophthalmologists with image analysis, and aids in the delivery of more individualized care in cardiology and precision medicine. These developments are boosting precision, optimizing daily tasks and providing patients with more individualized treatment. In practice, this could include imaging systems that prioritize patients who are most at risk or prediction technologies that help physicians allocate resources and reduce unnecessary workload. However, there are still critical obstacles to overcome. The biases of the training data may be reflected in the algorithms, which could exacerbate already-existing disparities. Since many models operate as 'black boxes', it can be challenging to understand their logic, which raises questions about accountability, ethics and trust. Clinical standards and regulations are still lagging behind technology, and incorporating AI into busy healthcare systems can be difficult and costly. Achieving its promise will require careful implementation, rigorous validation and sustained collaboration among clinicians, data scientists, engineers, ethicists and policymakers for safe adoption in clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiologyclinical decision supportdeep learningdigital pathologyhealthcare ethicsmachine learningmedical imagingprecision medicinerobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41424576
PMCPMC12715461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.