ArticleFrontiers in sleep2024
Revitalizing CPAP adherence: lessons from THN study in patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulators.
Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study aimed to address acceptance and long-term adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment among non-responder patients to ImThera THN system who initially declined this therapy. Material and methods: We employed a structured outpatient approach to communicate THN study results, categorize initial CPAP nonadherence reasons, and encourage CPAP trials through tailored appointments. Recorded follow-ups addressed individual concerns, providing medical guidance and acknowledging person-specific challenges. Adherence data were collected using CPAP hour meters at predetermined intervals, following Belgium's social security stipulations. Results: Between July 2014 and October 2016, eleven participants, including one woman, with prior CPAP experience (average 2 months) were enrolled. Initial non-adherence was linked to ENT or psychological factors. Ten patients agreed to CPAP trials, where interventions included changing CPAP brand, pressure adjustments, mask changes, and additional measures like cognitive-behavioral therapy and nasal spray. After 1 year, mean adherence was 6.3 ± 2 h/day, and average CPAP usage duration was 8.67 ± 2.13 years. As of November 2023, eight out of eleven patients were still actively using CPAP. Conclusion: In this investigation, we challenged the concept of CPAP non-adherence, highlighting evolving adherence and the significance of continuous monitoring and personalized interventions. Our findings underscore ongoing patient education, multidisciplinary support, and dynamic intervention adaptation for enhanced adherence in challenging patient populations. The results provide insights applicable to non-adherent patients with obstructive sleep apnea, emphasizing the importance of individualized care and sustained engagement for improved CPAP acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.