Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424521›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sleep2024

Polysomnographically mediated cognitive improvements in individuals with insomnia symptoms following continuous theta-burst stimulation of the default mode network.

Alisa Huskey, Julia M Fisher, Lindsey Hildebrand, David Negelspach, Kymberly Henderson-Arredondo, Samantha Jankowski, Salma I Patel, Ying-Hui Chou, Natalie S Dailey, William D S Killgore

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04953559 (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Default Mode Network to Improve Sleep), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04953559 narecruitingnot on this map

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Default Mode Network to Improve Sleep

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsInsomnia, PrimaryArmsActive cTBS, Sham cTBS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alisa HuskeyDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Julia M FisherBIO5 Institute, Statistics Consulting Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Lindsey HildebrandDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
David NegelspachDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Kymberly Henderson-ArredondoDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Samantha JankowskiDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Salma I PatelDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Ying-Hui ChouDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Natalie S DaileyDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
William D S KillgoreDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Insomnia is associated with mild cognitive impairment, although the mechanisms of this impairment are not well-understood. Timing of slow-wave and rapid eye movement sleep may help explain cognitive impairments common in insomnia. This investigation aimed to determine whether cognitive changes following continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) are attributable to active stimulation, polysomnographic parameters of sleep, or both. Method: Data presented here are part of a pilot clinical trial aiming to treat insomnia by targeting a node in the default mode network using an inhibitory 40-s (cTBS). A double-blind counterbalanced sham-controlled crossover design was conducted. Participants ( Results: Slow wave sleep duration influenced working memory in the active cTBS condition, with shorter duration predicting improvements in working memory post sleep ( Conclusions: Findings emphasize the important role that timing of slow-wave and rapid eye movement sleep have on information processing. Future work using larger sample sizes and more stimulation sessions is needed to determine optimal interactions between timing and duration of slow wave and rapid eye movement throughout the sleep period. Clinical trial registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04953559). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04953559?locStr=Arizona&country=United%20States&state=Arizona&cond=insomnia&intr=tms%20&rank=1.

Indexed as

continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS)insomniarapid eye movement (REM)repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)slow wave sleep (SWS)

Identifiers

PMID41424521
PMCPMC12713820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.