ArticleFrontiers in sleep2024
Objective and subjective sleep characteristics in hospitalized older adults and their associations to hospital outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Sleep in the hospital setting is understudied, with limited literature describing measurement of sleep quality. This study among older inpatients in an acute-care hospital describes sleep characteristics both objectively and subjectively, and explores the associations of sleep with hospital outcomes. Materials and methods: Older patients ( Results: The participants were on average 68.7 ± 6.5 years old, predominately white (77%) and 55% women. Average PSQI was high (9.1 ± 4.2) indicating poor sleep quality prior to admission. Actigraphy was well-tolerated, with most (89%) having complete data. Sleep during the hospital stay was disturbed, with low levels of total sleep time (5.6 ± 2.0 h) and high levels of fragmentation (sleep efficiency 68.4 ± 15.0%). Sleep interruption was reported on 71% of sleep diaries, with the most common reasons being due to medical care [measurement of vitals (23%), staff interruptions (22%), blood draws (21%)]. Those with lower sleep efficiency had more cognitive decline upon discharge. Although underpowered, there was a suggestion of an association with poor sleep and the likelihood of being discharged to a SNF. Those with worse self-reported sleep quality (PSQI) prior to admission had a slightly longer LOS. No associations were seen with sleep quality and likelihood of readmission. Conclusions: Collection of objective and subjective sleep measures was feasible among hospitalized older adults. Disrupted sleep was common, and was potentially related to poor hospital outcomes. Our next steps will be to leverage these results to design and implement an intervention to improve sleep in hospitalized adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.