ArticleFrontiers in sleep2024
The experience of children using long-term non-invasive ventilation: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural Lung Disease in Children and Adolescents With Severe Neurological Disorders.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify factors to optimize long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV) use by exploring the experience of children using LT-NIV and their parents. Study design and methods: A qualitative framework analysis method was used. Children aged 8-12 years who used LT-NIV for at least 3-months and their parents/guardians were approached to participate. Thematic analysis of data derived from focus group interviews, conducted separately for children and parents, was performed. Findings were coded and grouped into identified themes. Results: Data analysis identified four themes: (1) "The double-edged sword," which identified benefits and challenges of LT-NIV use; (2) "Feeling different," where children and parents described fears, frustrations, and concerns including emotional and social implications, and physical changes; (3) "It's not just about the mask," highlighted the influence of equipment issues, including the mask interface, headgear, tubing and humidity, and their impact on tolerance and use of LT-NIV; and (4) "Through the eyes of experience-children and parents as experts for change," which captured ideas for the functional and aesthetic improvement of the equipment including the need for pediatric specific technology. Conclusions: LT-NIV use has two sides; it helps to improve lives though requires an investment of time and commitment to ensure success. Investing in pediatric-specific equipment needs to be a priority as do alliances between healthcare providers, children who use LT-NIV, and their families. Future technology development and studies of adherence need to consider the experiences of children and their families to reduce the challenges and support optimal use of LT-NIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.