Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424415›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Machine learning-based prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates in diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancies.

Ohad Houri, Asaf Romano, Asnat Walfisch, Eran Hadar, Yinon Gilboa, Leor Perl, Nadav Loebl, Ron Unger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ohad HouriHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3393-813X
Asaf RomanoHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Asnat WalfischHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Eran HadarHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Yinon GilboaHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Leor PerlFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nadav LoeblInnovation Lab, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Ron UngerThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study determines whether a machine-learning model integrating sonographic biometry with maternal clinical parameters improves prediction of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) compared with Hadlock's EFW formula.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study including all singleton live births at ≥32 gestational weeks at a tertiary medical center. Predictors comprised biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length, maternal demographics and anthropometrics, obstetric history, chronic and gestational morbidity, and glucose values from screening and diagnosis. A CatBoost gradient-boosting model estimated the probability of LGA (birthweight ≥90th percentile). Performance was compared with Hadlock's EFW using area under the curve (AUC) and detection at a fixed 10% false-positive rate. A prespecified subgroup analysis evaluated pregnancies with pregestational or gestational diabetes. Performance was assessed with fivefold cross-validation; calibration and utility were examined by decision curve analysis.

resultsAmong 31 531 parturients, 18.17% delivered an LGA neonate. The model achieved an AUC of 0.946 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.938-0.955), significantly outperforming Hadlock's EFW (AUC 0.867; 95% CI, 0.854-0.881; P = 0.01) and yielding a higher detection rate at a 10% false-positive rate (79% vs. 63%). The most influential contributors were abdominal circumference, gestational age at delivery, fetal sex, and maternal age. In 3871 diabetic pregnancies, among whom 24% delivered LGA, performance remained high (AUC 0.890; 95% CI, 0.847-0.918) and exceeded Hadlock's formula (AUC 0.820; 95% CI, 0.772-0.863; P = 0.02).

conclusionA predictive algorithm, incorporating sonographic and non-sonographic features, as developed here, achieved superior accuracy compared to the traditional EFW formula in predicting LGA neonates, in both general and diabetic pregnant populations.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFetal MacrosomiaMachine LearningUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultBiometryBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMalePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyRetrospective Studiesdiabeteslarge‐for‐gestational‐age machine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID41424415
PMCPMC13173610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.