ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
Machine learning-based prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates in diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancies.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study determines whether a machine-learning model integrating sonographic biometry with maternal clinical parameters improves prediction of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) compared with Hadlock's EFW formula.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study including all singleton live births at ≥32 gestational weeks at a tertiary medical center. Predictors comprised biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femur length, maternal demographics and anthropometrics, obstetric history, chronic and gestational morbidity, and glucose values from screening and diagnosis. A CatBoost gradient-boosting model estimated the probability of LGA (birthweight ≥90th percentile). Performance was compared with Hadlock's EFW using area under the curve (AUC) and detection at a fixed 10% false-positive rate. A prespecified subgroup analysis evaluated pregnancies with pregestational or gestational diabetes. Performance was assessed with fivefold cross-validation; calibration and utility were examined by decision curve analysis.
resultsAmong 31 531 parturients, 18.17% delivered an LGA neonate. The model achieved an AUC of 0.946 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.938-0.955), significantly outperforming Hadlock's EFW (AUC 0.867; 95% CI, 0.854-0.881; P = 0.01) and yielding a higher detection rate at a 10% false-positive rate (79% vs. 63%). The most influential contributors were abdominal circumference, gestational age at delivery, fetal sex, and maternal age. In 3871 diabetic pregnancies, among whom 24% delivered LGA, performance remained high (AUC 0.890; 95% CI, 0.847-0.918) and exceeded Hadlock's formula (AUC 0.820; 95% CI, 0.772-0.863; P = 0.02).
conclusionA predictive algorithm, incorporating sonographic and non-sonographic features, as developed here, achieved superior accuracy compared to the traditional EFW formula in predicting LGA neonates, in both general and diabetic pregnant populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.