ReviewAnnals of African medicine2026
Navigating Autonomy: Enhancing Accuracy in Medical Decision-making Capacity Assessment.
Review in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEvaluating medical decision-making capability (DMC) is critical for maintaining patient autonomy and informed consent in health care. DMC refers to a patient's ability to comprehend information about their treatment, recognize its implications, reason through the options, and articulate their decision. Several assessment techniques, including the Aid to Capacity Evaluation, the Hopkins Capacity Assessment Test (HCAT), Understanding Treatment Disclosure (UTD), and the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool, have been discussed in this review. The legal distinction between decisional ability and competence is stressed, with courts making legal decisions based on expert testimony and healthcare providers conducting clinical assessments. The review also underlines the responsibility of physicians in assessing DMC and the need for continued monitoring in cases of shifting states such as delirium. This review emphasizes the importance of standardized training and robust tools for improving the accuracy and consistency of DMC assessments, ensuring that patient decisions are informed and autonomous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.