ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Can online videos posted by hobbyists be useful for conservation and science? A YouTube case study of the reproduction of the endangered white-edged fighting fish, Betta albimarginata.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The breeding aspects of white-edged fighting fish (Betta albimarginata) through YouTube videos were investigated in this study. Four videos were analysed for their coverage of key breeding aspects, including set-up, identification of sexes, spawning behaviour, incubation, larval rearing and other original observations. The results show considerable variability in the completeness of these aspects across the videos, with L-FATIH Channel and animal_guyy providing the most comprehensive information. Breeding set-ups ranged from large breeding tanks, with no specific cave mention to the use of coconut shell caves for spawning. Spawning behaviours were largely similar, featuring a 'breeding hug,' but differed in the use of caves for egg placement. The incubation process was well documented, with mouth-brooding males keeping eggs for 14-21 days. However, variations in larval rearing practices were observed, with some videos lacking details on feeding and growth. Original observations, such as the use of Terminalia catappa leaves to influence water quality, were also recorded. This study emphasizes the potential of YouTube as an educational tool for documenting B. albimarginata breeding techniques and highlights the need for more standardized and comprehensive breeding guides. By improving the accessibility of breeding information through platforms like YouTube, hobbyists can contribute to an in-depth knowledge of breeding of threatened species, which could then be useful to implement conservative aquaculture programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.