Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41424168›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026

Validation of the 10-Item Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-10) for Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Daniella Dias de Oliveira, Aron Charles Barbosa da Silva, Jhonata Botelho Protazio, Gabriela Nascimento de Santana, Bruno Ruocco Verengue, Patrícia Gabrielle Dos Santos, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Validation of the 10-Item Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-10) for Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniella Dias de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aron Charles Barbosa da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-2616
Jhonata Botelho ProtazioPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8468-0434
Gabriela Nascimento de SantanaPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4684-1118
Bruno Ruocco VerenguePostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6726-337X
Patrícia Gabrielle Dos SantosPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-0603
Almir Vieira Dibai-FilhoPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-8248
Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-GomesPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-7537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional capacity assessment in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is essential because it relates to pain, disability, and quality of life. Reliable, sensitive, and validated tools are needed to measure lower limb function. PURPOSE: To validate the Brazilian Portuguese version of the 10-item Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-10) for people with KOA.

methodsA cross-sectional validation study involved 100 participants with KOA. The agreement between the 10-item (LEFS-10) and 20-item (LEFS-20) scales was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) between the LEFS-10 and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). Test-retest reliability was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimum detectable change (MDC). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Ceiling and floor effects were also evaluated.

resultsMost individuals had right or bilateral KOA, with diagnosis duration and persistent pain exceeding 5 years. LEFS-10 scores showed strong correlations with the original LEFS-20 (rho = 0.92), NPRS (rho = -0.78), WOMAC pain (rho = -0.69), stiffness (rho = -0.67), physical function (rho = -0.70), and WHODAS (rho = -0.74). Internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). In a subsample of 50 participants, test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), with a SEM of 1.05 points (6.7%) and an MDC of 2.91 points (18.6%), with no ceiling or floor effects. DISCUSSION: The LEFS-10 demonstrates excellent concordance compared with LEFS-20, good convergent validity, adequate internal consistency, high reliability, and favorable measurement error parameters, making it suitable for individuals with KOA.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationLower ExtremityOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementQuality of LifeReproducibility of Resultschronic painknee osteoarthritismeasurement propertiesmusculoskeletal diseasesrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41424168
PMCPMC12720057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.