ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Convenience Versus Continuity: A Pilot Study of Care Transfer to a Satellite Clinic for Patients With Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
IntroductionMultiple myeloma (MM) is associated with significant financial toxicity due to the high costs of treatment, including travel burdens. Satellite clinics aim to reduce travel burdens by bringing specialized care closer to patients' homes. This study investigates the effectiveness of transferring established MM patients to a new satellite clinic closer to their homes.MethodsPatients receiving care for plasma cell dyscrasias, including MM, at the primary campus were prospectively screened for eligibility to transfer to a satellite clinic within their catchment area from August to December 2023. Eligible patients were offered the option to transition their care. The proportion of actual transfers was tracked, and reasons patients were ineligible or declined to transfer were recorded.ResultsOut of 62 identified patients, 28 (45%) were deemed not transfer candidates by their provider. Among the 34 eligible patients, 10 (29%) opted to transfer. The overall transfer rate was 16% (95% CI: 8-28%). Reasons for declining transfer included comfort with current providers, preference for the primary campus, and concerns about the satellite clinic's quality of care.ConclusionsMost patients were either not eligible or unwilling to transfer to the satellite clinic once care had been established at the primary campus. Due to the limited uptake of this intervention, directing appropriate patients to satellite clinics at initial referral may be a more effective way to increase utilization of these sites. Enhancing satellite clinic capacity and addressing perceived quality disparities are also essential to boost their utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.