ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2026
Examining Biomarkers for Dyslipidemia, Diabetes, and NAFLD by CDC's 2022 Extended BMI Percentiles in US Youth Aged 6-17 Years.
Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of BMI percentages of obesity thresholds and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Beijing.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Examining Biomarkers for Dyslipidemia, Diabetes, and NAFLD by CDC's 2022 Extended BMI Percentiles in US Youth Aged 6-17 Years.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined associations between CDC's 2022 extended BMI percentiles (BMIp) and cardiometabolic biomarkers.
methodsUsing electronic medical record data, we included patients aged 6-17 years with BMI ≥ 85th percentile who had at least one of the following: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglycerides, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for (1) borderline or abnormal and (2) abnormal lab values by extended BMIp (85th-< 95th, 95th-< 98th, 98th-< 99th, 99th-< 99.9th, ≥ 99.9th).
resultsCompared to those with overweight (BMIp 85th-< 95th), patients in higher extended BMIp categories had a higher prevalence of borderline or abnormal HbA1c (aPR range: 1.46-2.79), ALT (aPR range: 1.58-2.59), triglycerides (aPR range: 1.24-1.46), total cholesterol (aPR range: 1.11-1.23), HDL (aPR range: 1.40-1.94), and LDL (aPR range: 1.23-1.55). Dose-response relationships were observed for multiple cardiometabolic biomarkers. Similar patterns were found for abnormal lab values.
conclusionsMany US youth aged 6-17 with overweight and obesity had borderline or abnormal cardiometabolic biomarkers. Risks varied within obesity: higher extended BMIp were linked to a greater likelihood of borderline or abnormal lab values. Identifying extended BMIp thresholds tied to these risks could facilitate clinical practice, including identifying high-risk patients and informing escalation of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.