ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026
Development of a novel risk score reflecting the relative harm potential of synthetic cannabinoids based on prevalence estimates, well-documented intoxication cases and basic pharmacological data.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsWhile the health hazards of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are often approximated using in vitro pharmacological parameters as surrogate, this approach fails to consider pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic complexity. This study aimed to develop a practical risk score for SCRAs prevalent in Germany between 2013 and 2021, based on prevalence data and differentiated data on intoxication cases in the same period of time.
designThe score integrates data from routine forensic serum/blood and urine analysis and clinical data from a prospective study involving emergency department patients after consumption of new psychoactive substances (NPS) (symptoms and quantification data).
settingSCRA prevalence data were obtained from a database query of routine serum/blood and urine analyses conducted at the Institute of Forensic Medicine Freiburg (2013-2021). Intoxication case data were obtained from a prospective study of patients treated in German emergency departments and reported to the Poisons Information Center Freiburg. PARTICIPANTS/CASES: During the study period, 9929 serum/blood and 45 464 urine samples were routinely analysed for SCRAs. Forty-eight non-fatal intoxications with clinical symptoms were included, with written consent provided by participants. MEASUREMENTS: Twelve SCRAs were selected based on their prevalence. Quantification in serum/blood and urine samples was conducted with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The human cannabinoid receptor 1 affinities and activities were assessed using a competitive radioligand binding assay with [
findingsFrom 2013 to 2021, 1633 serum/blood and 8030 urine samples tested positive for one or more SCRAs (positive rate serum/blood: 16.5%; urine: 17.7%). The risk score comprises three parts: (1) SCRA prevalence in routine case samples relative to the occurrence of intoxication cases in a certain time-frame; (2) the Poison Severity Score; and (3) Toxicological Significance Score, to account for the extent to which each substance contributed to the observed clinical symptoms and consequently to the overall intoxication. The higher the risk score value, the greater the associated toxicological risk of an SCRA in the test set. Risk score values ranged from 9.9 (5F-PB-22) to 3.1 (5F-Cumyl-PEGACLONE). No inverse relationship was observed between the risk score ranking and the receptor affinity or activity values based on visual comparison of the respective plots.
conclusionsIn vitro potency of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) does not clearly correlate with harm potential, and hence other properties of the SCRAs seem to be involved. The risk score introduced here provides a novel framework for assessing the potential hazards of emerging SCRAs by integrating routine forensic data with clinical intoxication case analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.