ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on cross-dataset cardiac signal domain generalization and feature interpretability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-dataset modeling of electrocardiogram signals faces the dual challenges of domain shift and insufficient interpretability in clinical applications. To address these issues, this study proposes a Transformer-based cross-domain ECG modeling framework that incorporates a Domain-invariant Feature Enhancement Module and an Interpretability-driven Attention Constraint Mechanism, aiming to simultaneously improve cross-domain generalization and clinical interpretability. Experiments on four authoritative arrhythmia databases (MIT-BIH Supraventricular, MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, INCART, and SCD-Holter) demonstrate that the proposed method achieves the best performance across all target domains, with accuracy on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia dataset reaching 0.768 (an improvement of 8.4% over the baseline Transformer) and F1-score on the INCART dataset attaining 0.898 (a gain of 4.7% compared with the second-best method). In addition, ablation studies verify the complementary contributions of DFEM and IACM, while feature importance analysis and t-SNE visualization further confirm that the model consistently attends to clinically relevant features. These results indicate that the proposed framework can effectively mitigate domain shift without relying on target-domain samples, while enhancing interpretability alongside discriminative performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.