ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2025
Lessons from a large national "hospital at home" program.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hospital at Home in 10 years-Here, borrow my binoculars.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Caregiver Burden at the Onset of Acute Hospital-At-Home.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Observational
- Real-world outcomes from 2,905 episodes of hospital at home care: a propensity-matched cohort study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital at Home (HAH) is a potential solution to the increasing demand for hospital beds, but concerns remain about its scalability. This study examines safety, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction in a large-scale HAH program.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized data from Clalit Health Services (CHS). The study population included all patients participating in the HAH program during 2022 who were discharged with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, congestive heart failure, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis. These individuals were matched with patients admitted to general medical wards, and logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between admission type and outcomes. The primary safety endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days, while the primary effectiveness endpoint was rehospitalization within 30 days. Patient experience was measured using a telephone questionnaire.
resultsA total of 3,335 HAH patients were matched to 3,335 hospital patients. At 30 days, mortality was 192 (5.8%) for HAH patients and 305 (9.1%) for hospital patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.6 (CI 0.49–0.73, P < 0.001). Readmissions at 30 days were 435 (13%) among HAH patients and 526 (16%) in hospital patients, adjusted OR 0.8 (CI 0.70–0.92, p = 0.002). 84% of patients indicated a preference for HAH over hospital admission for future care.
conclusionsHAH can provide a safe and effective setting to treat patients who need hospital-level care, with high levels of patient satisfaction. HAH has the potential to provide a scalable solution for the ever-increasing demand for hospital beds. Trial registration The study was approved by the CHS (community) institutional ethics and data utilization committee (0169–21).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.