Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41423631›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Investigating action topography in visual cortex and deep artificial neural networks.

Davide Cortinovis, Nhut Truong, Hans Op de Beeck, Stefania Bracci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Davide CortinovisCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy. davide.cortinovis@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5075-1941
Nhut TruongCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Hans Op de BeeckBrain and Cognition, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2250-212X
Stefania BracciCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1435-2536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-level visual cortex contains category-selective areas embedded within larger-scale topographic maps like animacy and real-world size. Here, we propose action as a key organizing factor shaping visual cortex topography and assess the ability of topographic deep artificial neural networks (DANNs) in capturing this organization. Using fMRI, we examined responses to images of body-parts and objects with different degrees of action properties. In left lateral occipitotemporal cortex, we identified a topographically-organized action gradient, with overlapping activations for bodies, hands, tools, and manipulable objects along a dorsal-posterior to ventral-anterior axis, culminating at the intersection of body parts and objects exhibiting higher action properties. Multivariate analyses confirmed action as a crucial organizing principle, while shape and animacy dominated ventral occipitotemporal cortex and DANNs, which exhibited no action-based organization. Our proposed action dimension serves as a further organizing principle of object categories, advancing understanding of visual cortex organization and its divergence from DANN-based models.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerVisual CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationTemporal LobeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41423631
PMCPMC12852736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.