ArticleScientific reports2025
D3O-IIoT: deep reinforcement learning-driven dynamic deception orchestration for industrial IoT security.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainability-driven adaptive cyber deception control system for autonomous network defense.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Co-ADAM: a co-evolutionary signaling game framework for equilibrium cyber deception in industrial IoT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating Synthetic Cyber Deception Strategies Under Uncertainty via Game Theory Approach: Linking Information Leakage and Game Outcomes in Cyber Deception.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) systems are under mounting cyber threats that take advantage of the resource shortage and operational vulnerability of industrial systems. The current intrusion detection schemes are based on either the static or passive form of defense that is not dynamically adapted to the changing attacks. This paper presents D3O-IIoT, a progressive reinforcement learning model that dynamically coordinates deception techniques, including honeypot deployment, moving target defense, fake telemetry injection, and node isolation on the basis of real time threat monitoring. The defense problem is formulated as a Markov Decision Process, in which a Dueling Deep Q-Network agent maximizes a multi-objective reward to balance between attack mitigation, deception engagement, false positive control and resource cost. Experiments on three IIoT datasets (CIC-IIoT2025, WUSTL-IIoT2021, TON-IoT) demonstrate that D3O-IIoT has a 13.7% attack mitigation rate with a 0.3% false alarm, which is an improvement of 293–767% (p < 0.0001) over baselines. Generalization is confirmed by cross-dataset validation (97.7% and 77.8% retention on TON-IoT and WUSTL-IIoT, respectively). Results of Ablation determine that the most critical component of reward is false positive control (51.4% degradation upon removal) and that sensitivity analysis indicates the possibility of 46.1% tunability through risk threshold change. The acquired policy favors isolation (71.2 per cent) on confirmed threats and honeypots (15.4 per cent) on reconnaissance with a 2.07ms latency that can be deployed in real time. D3O-IIoT builds upon IIoT cybersecurity by substituting fixed set rule-based defenses with dynamic and learning-based deception orchestration, balancing various practical goals under resource-constrained conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.