ArticleCommunications psychology2025
Accented speech modulates multiple event-related potential components across multiple levels of language processing.
Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linguistics and human brain: a perspective of computational neuroscience.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Review
- Effects of Statistical Learning on Target Detection Speed Can Reflect Prediction.Cognitive science · 2026Article
- Language Experience Shapes Neural Grouping of Speech by Accent: EEG Evidence from Native, Second-Language, and Heritage Listeners.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accents are ubiquitous in spoken communication, and while listeners can rapidly adapt to accented speech, the neural mechanisms supporting this flexibility remain poorly understood. Successful adaptation requires developing new sound representations without compromising the stability of long-term speech norms. This delicate balance between plasticity and stability illustrates a fundamental challenge faced by all cognitive systems. To investigate how the brain manages this trade-off, we recorded electroencephalographic activity from 23 native English speakers as they categorized words produced in either canonical American English or an unfamiliar accent. We contrasted two potential mechanisms: one in which listeners fully restructure their sound-to-category mappings to reflect accent-specific pronunciations, and another in which they downweight the functional relevance of sounds that deviate from long-term expectations. Listeners relied on short-term speech regularities to reduce perceptual weighting of acoustic dimensions that did not conform to the canonical norm. Consistent with this perceptual shift, we observed less robust neural encoding of sound differences along the downweighted dimensions. Notably, these adaptive neural adjustments emerged as early as 100 milliseconds, at latencies associated with subphonemic auditory processing, and persisted through later stages linked to phonological and post-phonological processing. These findings indicate that rapid adaptation to unfamiliar accents involves downweighting the functional relevance of sound cues based on short-term input statistics, rather than fully restructuring native sound-to-category mappings. This mechanism enables flexible adjustment to novel speech inputs while preserving long-term linguistic representations, illustrating how the auditory system negotiates the trade-off between plasticity and representational stability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.