Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41423515›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Soft-voting classifier for outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury patients with clear consciousness: model development and error pattern analysis.

Kazuya Matsuo, Hideo Aihara, Yoshie Hara, Akitsugu Morishita, Yoshio Sakagami, Shigeru Miyake, Shotaro Tatsumi, Haruo Yamashita, Takashi Sasayama, Yoshihiro Muragaki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kazuya MatsuoDepartment of Medical Device Engineering, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Hyogo, Japan. kkmatsuo@outlook.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6721-1353
Hideo AiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Medical Center, Kakogawa, Japan.
Yoshie HaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center and Kobe Red Cross Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Akitsugu MorishitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Medical Center, Kakogawa, Japan.
Yoshio SakagamiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, Sumoto, Japan.
Shigeru MiyakeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kita-Harima Medical Center, Ono, Japan.
Shotaro TatsumiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hirohata Steel Memorial Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
Haruo YamashitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center and Kobe Red Cross Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Takashi SasayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yoshihiro MuragakiDepartment of Medical Device Engineering, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Hyogo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K03307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate outcome prediction enables stratified treatment in traumatic brain injury (TBI), a field that has yet to achieve a major therapeutic breakthrough. We aimed to develop a model to predict unfavorable in-hospital outcomes in TBI patients presenting with clear consciousness— a particularly challenging and previously unexplored target. We developed a soft-voting ensemble machine learning (ML) model combining six algorithms, including transformer-based architectures, to predict unfavorable discharge outcomes, trained on 349 cases with 17 clinical parameters and tested on 90. To develop the model, we used data from patients aged 10 years or older with TBI who were admitted to Japanese hospitals with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. Additionally, permutation importance and misclassification analyses were conducted. Patients with unfavorable outcomes at discharge accounted for 76 of 439 (17.3%). The ML model outperformed the statistical model in sensitivity (43.8% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.003), specificity (97.3% vs. 95.9%, p = 0.01), and accuracy (87.8% vs. 85.6%, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed no significant difference (0.843 vs. 0.796, p = 0.4). Permutation importance analysis revealed that the ML model assigned greater importance to D-dimer and systolic blood pressure compared to the logistic regression model. Misclassified cases had fewer acute subdural hematomas and more normal hemoglobin levels than did correctly predicted cases. Prospective validation and integration into emergency care workflows are necessary for clinical implementation of this newly developed prediction model for TBI patients with clear consciousness.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticConsciousnessMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsChildClassification AlgorithmsFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsGlasgow outcome scaleMachine learning algorithmsMachine prediction methodsMild traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.