ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence CNN for information system optimization and decision support model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the continuous growth in the scale and complexity of modern information systems, achieving high-precision system state perception and efficient resource scheduling still faces significant challenges. Especially under conditions of dynamic loads, data loss, or sudden peaks, existing methods usually have problems such as limited classification accuracy, slow strategy response, and insufficient robustness. To address these issues, this study proposes a decision support model based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Through an end-to-end mechanism, the model effectively integrates system state recognition and strategy generation, and constructs a closed-loop optimization and feedback framework to realize system-level resource scheduling optimization. Experimental results on two public datasets, Azure VM Workload Traces and Google Cluster Data, demonstrate the model’s effectiveness. The model achieves a state recognition accuracy of 96.2%, an F1 score of 0.961, an average policy response time of 135.5 milliseconds, and reduces scheduling failure rate from 6.1% to 2.2%, representing a 63.9% improvement. Furthermore, the model maintains over 90% accuracy and policy success rate even under challenging conditions such as data loss and sudden workload surges. These results confirm the model’s strengths in real-time performance, accuracy, and robustness, highlighting its strong potential for practical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.