Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41423507›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026

High-dose chemotherapy in male germ cell cancer patients-a study by the SWENOTECA group.

Anna K Jansson, Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark, Helene F S Negaard, Torgrim Tandstad, Olof Ståhl, Annika Hedlund, Åsa Karlsdottir, Martin Hellström, Carl W Langberg, Camilla Sköld and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna K JanssonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. anna.k.jansson@igp.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-9729
Gabriella Cohn-CedermarkDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helene F S NegaardDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Torgrim TandstadThe Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Olof StåhlDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Annika HedlundDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Åsa KarlsdottirDepartment of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Martin HellströmDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Carl W LangbergDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla SköldDepartment of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-0003
Hege S Haugnes *Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ingrid Glimelius *Department of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-3041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorld-wide consensus is lacking regarding patient selection and timing of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem-cell support in males with germ cell cancer (GCC). However, within the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA) guidelines are harmonised. Our aim was to evaluate survival and toxicity in HDCT-treated GCC-patients within SWENOTECA.

methodsIn total, 7322 GCC patients were diagnosed between 2011-2021 in Sweden and Norway, among which 80 ( ~ 1.1%) patients were treated with HDCT. Indications for HDCT were: Delayed tumour-marker decline during primary/intensified primary treatment (n = 45), progressive disease (n = 29), or relapse (n = 25). The HDCT-regimen consisted of two cycles of carboplatin/etoposide.

resultsThe 5-year overall survival (5-yr OS) and progression-free survival (5-yr PFS) after HDCT was 55% and 43%, respectively. Indication delayed tumour-marker decline: 5-yr OS:75%, 5-yr PFS:53%, indication progressive disease 5-yr OS:29%, 5-yr PFS:18%, indication relapse 5-yr OS:61%, 5-yr PFS:58%. Four (5%) died due to HDCT-related complications, none within the delayed tumour-marker decline group. Grade 3-4 infections were seen in n = 69, 86%.

conclusionHDCT-treatment according to the SWENOTECA-programme was feasible and associated with promising OS. Early intensification to HDCT for patients with delayed tumour-marker decline during primary-treatment was safe and led to 5-yr OS of 75% with no toxic deaths.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultCarboplatinEtoposideHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwaySwedenYoung AdultCarboplatinEtoposide

Identifiers

PMID41423507
PMCPMC12905181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.