Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41423462›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessment of management accounting information using decision algorithm with prioritized weights in circular fermatean fuzzy CRITIC WASPAS model.

Qingping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Qingping LiHunan Polytechnic of Environment and Biology, Hengyang, 421005, Hunan, China. Lqp11328@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this manuscript, fuzzy sets are used to handle uncertainty in enhancing risk management and operational efficiency in management accounting based on a decision-making algorithm. For this purpose, a circular fermatean fuzzy (CFF) set (CFFS), which not only contains membership and non-membership grades but also provides circular behavior. Management accounting information is a process of collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting financial and non-financial data that is specifically designed to aid internal management in planning, decision-making, performance evaluation, and control of business operations. For this constraint, extend criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method and the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method into the CFF framework. The proposed model can easily describe the importance of multiple attributes and the weight of decision-makers. Additionally, this paper explored an algorithm for the multi-attribute group decision-making problem based on the CRITIC-WASPAS technique under the presence of defined linguistic terms. The defined techniques are significantly applied in handling uncertainties in hypothetical data obtained by management accounting. Moreover, this paper validates the defined model through a case study. To evaluate the challenges of management accounting, considering five alternatives, each with five attributes, to select the best option. After the evaluation, the second alternative, i.e., internal accounting, is the best. A sensitivity analysis confirms effectiveness and reliability. A comparative analysis is conducted between the proposed approach and previous aggregation operators to validate its performance and reliability.

Indexed as

Circular fermatean fuzzy setCRITIC-WASPAS modelManagement accountingMulti-attributes group decision-making approach

Identifiers

PMID41423462
PMCPMC12738635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.