ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of management accounting information using decision algorithm with prioritized weights in circular fermatean fuzzy CRITIC WASPAS model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this manuscript, fuzzy sets are used to handle uncertainty in enhancing risk management and operational efficiency in management accounting based on a decision-making algorithm. For this purpose, a circular fermatean fuzzy (CFF) set (CFFS), which not only contains membership and non-membership grades but also provides circular behavior. Management accounting information is a process of collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting financial and non-financial data that is specifically designed to aid internal management in planning, decision-making, performance evaluation, and control of business operations. For this constraint, extend criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method and the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method into the CFF framework. The proposed model can easily describe the importance of multiple attributes and the weight of decision-makers. Additionally, this paper explored an algorithm for the multi-attribute group decision-making problem based on the CRITIC-WASPAS technique under the presence of defined linguistic terms. The defined techniques are significantly applied in handling uncertainties in hypothetical data obtained by management accounting. Moreover, this paper validates the defined model through a case study. To evaluate the challenges of management accounting, considering five alternatives, each with five attributes, to select the best option. After the evaluation, the second alternative, i.e., internal accounting, is the best. A sensitivity analysis confirms effectiveness and reliability. A comparative analysis is conducted between the proposed approach and previous aggregation operators to validate its performance and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.