Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41423436›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2026

Divergent Phosphorus-Mining Strategies in Simple and Compound Cluster Roots in Extremely Phosphorus-Impoverished Soils in Southwest Australia.

Hirotsuna Yamada, Clément E Gille, Pallavi, Li Yan, Gareth Nealon, Jun Wasaki, Erik J Veneklaas, Hans Lambers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hirotsuna YamadaGraduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9481-966X
Clément E GilleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3890-0402
PallaviSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Li YanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-2509
Gareth NealonCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, and the School of Molecular Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7037-7135
Jun WasakiGraduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-607X
Erik J VeneklaasSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-4056
Hans LambersSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4118-2272

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200101013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most Proteaceae and some Fabaceae species produce specialised cluster roots (CRs), and are abundant in severely phosphorus (P)-impoverished soils in southwest Australia. Two types of CRs, compound and simple, have been identified. However, the difference in their P-mining strategies remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted glasshouse and field experiments to compare the P-acquisition strategies among 18 CR-producing species in Proteaceae and Fabaceae. Proteaceae produced a significantly larger mass of CRs than Fabaceae. Particularly, Banksia species produced the largest mass of compound CRs and exhibited the greatest net plant-absorbed P in pots and consistently higher mature leaf manganese concentration in the field. In contrast, Hakea and Grevillea species produced less mass of simple CRs but three times as much soil adhered to their CRs per CR dry weight, resulting in greater absorbed P per CR weight. All plants depleted similar P compounds from soil and accessed c. 52% of P that was not extracted by a NaOH-EDTA solution, suggesting that both CRs shared a common physiological function for mining scarcely available P. This study highlights two divergent P-acquisition strategies: greater biomass investment in compound CRs versus greater P-acquisition efficiency in simple CRs.

Indexed as

PhosphorusPlant RootsProteaceaeSoilAustraliaBiomassManganeseMiningPlant LeavesManganesePhosphorusSoilBanksiacluster rootFabaceaeHakeaphosphorusProteaceaesouthwest Australia

Identifiers

PMID41423436
PMCPMC12976584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.