ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026
Injuries in deep time: interpreting competitive behaviours in extinct reptiles via palaeopathology.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For over a century, palaeopathology has been used as a tool for understanding evolution, disease in past communities and populations, and to interpret behaviour of extinct taxa. Physical traumas in particular have frequently been the justification for interpretations about aggressive and even competitive behaviours in extinct taxa. However, the standards used in these interpretations have been inconsistent and occasionally questionable, and knowledge of extant reptile pathology is limited. Interpretations about the timelines and causes of unhealed bone damage are unreliable, and so behavioural implications from these marks are dubious. Even in the case of tooth marks, perimortem damage can be difficult to distinguish from postmortem alteration. In this review, methods from the anthropological sciences are adapted for the purposes of palaeontology, especially in establishing a new framework to distinguish antemortem traumatic damage from other similarly presenting features like sediment encrustation, postmortem damage/taphonomic features, variants of anatomical features, and non-traumatic palaeopathologies. Even in cases where traumatic palaeopathologies are accurately macroscopically identified, noting isolated incidences may not provide sufficient evidence to interpret behaviour at any taxonomic level. Future research directions in modern reptile pathology are proposed to improve the efficacy of traumatic palaeopathologies as a tool in interpreting extinct reptile behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.