ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Phase 1 study evaluating the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacodynamics of recombinant interleukin-15 in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with refractory cancers.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCombinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytokine therapies have shown promise in cancer immunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-15 (rhIL-15) in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced, refractory cancers.
methodsThis open-label, non-randomized study employed a 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of rhIL-15 combined with fixed doses of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Safety and tolerability were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria, and preliminary efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and immune-related RECIST (iRECIST) criteria. Pharmacodynamic studies evaluated changes in immune cell populations in peripheral blood and paired baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsies.
resultsThirty-one patients were enrolled, with a median age of 56 years (range: 24-81 years). Five patients received rhIL-15 with either nivolumab or ipilimumab in safety run-in cohorts, 26 patients received rhIL-15 with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The most common cancer types were gastrointestinal (n=7) or gynecologic (n=5). The MTD was 1 µg/kg/day rhIL-15, 240 mg nivolumab, and 1 mg/kg ipilimumab. The triplet combination showed a manageable safety profile; the most common treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were chills (20/26, 77%), fever (18/26, 69%), injection site reaction (15/26, 58%), anemia (14/26, 54%), and fatigue (14/26, 54%). Lymphopenia (4/26, 15%) was the most common grade 3/4 trAE. Pharmacodynamic analysis of tumor biopsies revealed increases in CD8+, CD8+CD3ζpY142+ (ie, activated CD8+T cells), PD-1+CD3+, and CD45RO+CD3+ (ie, memory T cells) in some patients. Tumor infiltration of natural killer (NK) and γδ T cells was also observed. NK cell populations in peripheral blood were modulated by rhIL-15. 11 of 26 patients (42%) had stable disease as a best response on the triplet regimen. A partial response was measured after cycle 1 in one patient (4%) with cholangiocarcinoma and confirmed after cycle 2; this patient completed 16 cycles.
conclusionsThe combination of rhIL-15 with nivolumab and ipilimumab was safe and induced changes in immune cell populations in some patients. However, preliminary signs of efficacy were limited. Pharmacodynamic findings may support further clinical development of this combination with alternative dosing regimens or combinations of rhIL-15 with other therapeutic modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.